<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Insert creative title here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briancroxall.net/readwrite/2009/08/insert-creative-title-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briancroxall.net/readwrite/2009/08/insert-creative-title-here/</link>
	<description>English 310 at Clemson University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:45:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Croxall</title>
		<link>http://briancroxall.net/readwrite/2009/08/insert-creative-title-here/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Croxall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancroxall.net/readwrite/?p=59#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious, Kate, if a child-like approach (which Miller espouses in one way) has helped you to read these poems? It&#039;s certainly an appropriate approach to reading something like Williams&#039;s poem. I like both of them because they are especially easy to read for plot: no complicated language, not especially long, and nothing that is intentionally obscure...except for that matter of the wheelbarrow. This is something we definitely want to think about further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious, Kate, if a child-like approach (which Miller espouses in one way) has helped you to read these poems? It&#8217;s certainly an appropriate approach to reading something like Williams&#8217;s poem. I like both of them because they are especially easy to read for plot: no complicated language, not especially long, and nothing that is intentionally obscure&#8230;except for that matter of the wheelbarrow. This is something we definitely want to think about further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enewlan</title>
		<link>http://briancroxall.net/readwrite/2009/08/insert-creative-title-here/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>enewlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancroxall.net/readwrite/?p=59#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I had the same confusion about the hunters at first but when I re-read the poem I got the feeling that the speaker seemed annoyed at the hunters because they destroy the wall and then he has to fix it. He seems to think poorly of them because they destroy the wall simply to please themselves by finding a single rabbit, which is selfish and inefficient. Perhaps he mentions it in passing or maybe he dislikes the hunters destroying a boundary he so carefully set up? 
I could be wrong though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same confusion about the hunters at first but when I re-read the poem I got the feeling that the speaker seemed annoyed at the hunters because they destroy the wall and then he has to fix it. He seems to think poorly of them because they destroy the wall simply to please themselves by finding a single rabbit, which is selfish and inefficient. Perhaps he mentions it in passing or maybe he dislikes the hunters destroying a boundary he so carefully set up?<br />
I could be wrong though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

