wøw
Watching “Dakota,” in The New and Improved Young-Haw Chang Heavy Industries, was a completely strange and random for me. I did not know what to expect when I clicked the link and was abruptly awakened after the first drum beat and flashing word.
At first, I tried to read everything that popped up on the screen. After much reading and hard work, just trying to keep up became impossible. That is when it became a game to me. I read what I could and enjoyed the rest. When, at first, I was trying to connect ideas and thoughts within the statements, now I could just enjoy what I caught and if I could make sense of it, well, that just enhanced my experience. If I could not, then oh well, nothing was lost—I’ll just catch it next time I see the video.
The words come at you strongly. They are black, clear text on a white screen. The writing is literally in black and white, but the meaning is not that simple. This is what literature, as a whole, is. The actual art is the black and white writing on the page, yet the meaning is not given or presented as such.
I struggled through Lot 49 because I could not find that black and white meaning, but I have learned that the meaning is most of the times not that identifiable. And sometimes the meaning and purpose is simply enjoyment. The video was definitely different and I wonder if this is what literature will eventually become. Will literature evolve from black and white texts on a page to images on a screen?
1 comment
Your post makes me curious to know how often people watched these texts. Perhaps that’s something we can discuss in class tomorrow.
And it’s worth noting that while a number of authors think that meaning is not or should not be identifiable that many others feel differently. And it’s not just old-fashioned types who believe that meaning can be created through literature. I would hazard the guess that Trethewey is invested in creating meaning in her texts.
Leave a Comment