The key to this poem, I think, is the word “Erebus.” It is defined as “the dark region beneath the earth through which the dead must pass before they reach Hades.” She uses the phrase “the Erebus I keep you in” twice. Tretheway is trying to say that her mother is forced to stay in Erebus, or some kind of purgatory. Purgatory is a place where one pays for their sins, and the soul of Tretheway’s mother, while perhaps not paying for her sins, is being forced to die again and again. Tretheway also says that she is constantly “forsaking” her mother, which could also feel like a punishment to the mother’s soul. For Tretheway herself, this is also a torturous exercise. An air of guilt is present throughout the poem. She feels guilty for continally forsaking her, for being asleep while she was dying, for letting her “slip through the rift… between her slumber and her waking.” Tretheway also has to go through losing her mother over and over again. Each night, in her dreams, she feels like she has her mother again, and when she wakes up, her mother is gone. Each morning she feels that loss. Also, each night when she goes to sleep, she knows that she is going to resurrect her mother, then lose her again, and have to feel the loss and the grief anew. It’s a torturous exercise for both Tretheway and her mother’s soul, but she find she can’t keep herself from continually dreaming about her mother, something that is also frustrating, but probably that she doesn’t want to give up, because when she stops dreaming about her mother, she will lose her for good.
Online Office Hours
Meta
I’m glad that you looked up what Erebus is, Ashley, as the poem is difficult to parse without that information. I’m surprised, however, that you didn’t say anything about the very unusual form of this poem. How does that effect your understanding of what Trethewey is saying here?
Wow. I have to admit I didn’t even notice that before, and I can’t believe I didn’t because it’s so obvious! I guess I was focusing on the words themselves and not the form, which was a big mistake. At any rate, on looking at the poem again this time, and looking at the form, I see (obviously) that the second section is the first section backwards. I think this form reinforces the cyclical nature of the events in the poem. Also, being brought back to life after death is kind of… death backwards? So her mother died, and then Natasha keeps hitting play and then rewind. That’s what I got from it.